Why the electoral college should be

why the electoral college should be The electoral college has always had strong opponents who have argued that it should be abolished their reasons include the fact that, under certain circumstances, a president can be elected without winning the majority of electoral votes.

Views on the electoral college are often partisan the winner-take-all system explains why one candidate can get more votes nationwide while a different candidate wins in electoral college. The electoral college is actually a uniquely ingenious invention used to ensure states rights, guaranteeing that the united states remain a group of united individual states functioning together as unified federation, as opposed to a single nation. Opponents of the electoral college are further concerned about its possible role in depressing voter turnout their argument is that, since each state is entitled to the same number of electoral votes regardless of its voter turnout, there is no incentive in the states to encourage voter participation.

why the electoral college should be The electoral college has always had strong opponents who have argued that it should be abolished their reasons include the fact that, under certain circumstances, a president can be elected without winning the majority of electoral votes.

- why its time to reform the electoral college even though the electoral college worked in the past it isn’t working for the present the electoral college was created to help elect a president how that works is the 50 states are assigned so many voting representatives depending. Here are some reasons why the united states should retain the electoral college system and what the founding fathers intended when they created it george w bush was awarded the state's 25 electoral votes and won the presidency through a 271 to 266 vote margin in the electoral college. Well, there is at least one practical reason why the system should stay as it is, according to judge richard posner the electoral college prevents run-off elections, so it produces a clear winner.

Ok, here’s the deal: the electoral college does in fact elect the president but the members of the electoral college are chosen by the people, based on their pledge to. To its critics, the electoral college is a relic that violates the democratic principle of one person, one vote, and distorts the presidential campaign by encouraging candidates to campaign only. Established in 1787, the electoral college is as old as the us constitution marquette magazine asked dr paul nolette, assistant professor in the department of political science, why, after 225. The electoral college was established in 1788 by article ii of the us constitution, which also established the executive branch of the us government, and was revised by the twelfth amendment (ratified june 15, 1804), the fourteenth amendment (ratified july 1868), and the twenty-third amendment (ratified mar 29, 1961. Elections are confusing learn what the electoral college is in under a minute usa today network a: when us citizens go to the polls.

The electoral college should be abolished every 4 years, our country makes an incredibly important decision we vote for the person who will represent the us in all domestic and international affairs the president. The electoral college should continue to be the system of voting used in the us until the country has reached a more secure period and has a well developed plan that would be proven more efficient than the system already in place. Well, this has been one hell of an election and one hell of an upset as a result, there are many jaded people on one side of the spectrum that are angry and protesting the results of this election.

Why the electoral college should be

why the electoral college should be The electoral college has always had strong opponents who have argued that it should be abolished their reasons include the fact that, under certain circumstances, a president can be elected without winning the majority of electoral votes.

The electoral college distorts presidential campaigns, disenfranchises voters and drives partisanship, stanford scholars say they suggest constitutional reforms to adopt a single national popular. On the surface, the math sounds good, but here are five reasons we should rid ourselves of the electoral college and go with a popular vote instead: the. sam thompson 1/12/14 ‘the electoral college should be replaced by a national popular vote’ discuss (45 marks) the electoral college is a political institution that every 4 years is indirectly given the task of electing the president and vice-president of the united states of america into power.

  • Leaving aside the fact that a deal is a deal, there are very practical reasons why we will always need the electoral college under our current constitutional system.
  • The official us electoral college web site, providing current information about the presidential election, information about the roles and responsibilities of state officials and electors, instructions for state officials and electors, the timeline of key dates for the presidential election, information about laws and legal requirements related to the presidential election and the electors.

If we abandoned the electoral college, and adopted a system in which a person could win the presidency with only a plurality of the popular votes we would be swamped with candidates. The electoral college is a good antidote to the poison of regionalism because it forces presidential candidates to seek support throughout the nation by making sure no state will be left behind. Should we reform the electoral college by robert a levy let’s start with the basics: in presidential races, each state has electoral votes equal to. The electoral college is widely regarded as an anachronism, a nondemocratic method of selecting a president that ought to be superseded by declaring.

why the electoral college should be The electoral college has always had strong opponents who have argued that it should be abolished their reasons include the fact that, under certain circumstances, a president can be elected without winning the majority of electoral votes. why the electoral college should be The electoral college has always had strong opponents who have argued that it should be abolished their reasons include the fact that, under certain circumstances, a president can be elected without winning the majority of electoral votes. why the electoral college should be The electoral college has always had strong opponents who have argued that it should be abolished their reasons include the fact that, under certain circumstances, a president can be elected without winning the majority of electoral votes.
Why the electoral college should be
Rated 3/5 based on 16 review

2018.